Aurélien COUDERC
2024-09-01 21:50:01 UTC
Dear m68k porters,
we have Qt6 failing to build on m68k.
This is kind of good news because it means it is being built. ð
It was not the case for Qt5 that had a build dep on firebird, missing on m68k and making in not buildable.
So now we have it building and failing to build. The build failure message [1] made me think of previous discussion where IIRC you explained that the m68k architecture is the only one with a memory alignment of 2 bytes / 16 bit.
Like most teams we try to avoid carying too many downstream patches but it would be cool to have Qt built on all archs. So if a maintainable patch can make m68k build we (=Patrick) would be willing to have it in Debian.
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qt6-base&arch=m68k&ver=6.7.2%2Bdfsg-2&stamp=1725026802&raw=0
Thanks for your help !
--
Aurélien for the Qt/KDE-team-for-which-the-Qt6-part-pretty-much-equals-Patrick
we have Qt6 failing to build on m68k.
This is kind of good news because it means it is being built. ð
It was not the case for Qt5 that had a build dep on firebird, missing on m68k and making in not buildable.
So now we have it building and failing to build. The build failure message [1] made me think of previous discussion where IIRC you explained that the m68k architecture is the only one with a memory alignment of 2 bytes / 16 bit.
Like most teams we try to avoid carying too many downstream patches but it would be cool to have Qt built on all archs. So if a maintainable patch can make m68k build we (=Patrick) would be willing to have it in Debian.
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qt6-base&arch=m68k&ver=6.7.2%2Bdfsg-2&stamp=1725026802&raw=0
Thanks for your help !
--
Aurélien for the Qt/KDE-team-for-which-the-Qt6-part-pretty-much-equals-Patrick