Discussion:
Perl 5.32 transition underway
(too old to reply)
Dominic Hargreaves
2020-11-08 21:00:01 UTC
Permalink
Hello Dominic!
I have uploaded Perl 5.32 to Debian unstable, starting a 600+ package
transition. Wide uninstallability is to be expected in sid for the next
few days until the necessary rebuilds have been completed.
There seem to be build issues on QEMU again as the build fails on m68k and
sh4. I also noticed that the build fails with many parallel jobs (building
with 64 jobs in my case).
Right, it looks like the issue described at #931641 has returned.
This was apparently[1] fixed in qemu-user but I don't know any more
details about the fix (or indeed the deployment status of the buildds)
to check how it regressed.

CCing the porter lists for any additional insights.

Dominic

[1] <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931641#47>
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-11-08 21:20:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dominic Hargreaves
Right, it looks like the issue described at #931641 has returned.
This was apparently[1] fixed in qemu-user but I don't know any more
details about the fix (or indeed the deployment status of the buildds)
to check how it regressed.
It must be a slightly different issue and most likely this bug #970460 [1].

A heads-up to us porters would have been nice prior the upload, now I'm
very much in a hurry to get perl_5.32 to be built not to fall back in the
transition *sigh*.

Adrian
Post by Dominic Hargreaves
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970460
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - ***@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - ***@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Dominic Hargreaves
2020-11-08 22:00:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Post by Dominic Hargreaves
Right, it looks like the issue described at #931641 has returned.
This was apparently[1] fixed in qemu-user but I don't know any more
details about the fix (or indeed the deployment status of the buildds)
to check how it regressed.
It must be a slightly different issue and most likely this bug #970460 [1].
A heads-up to us porters would have been nice prior the upload, now I'm
very much in a hurry to get perl_5.32 to be built not to fall back in the
transition *sigh*.
Hi, I'm sorry about that. I don't think either of us noticed the
failure in the experimental upload in September. It's easy to miss
failures of non-release architectures, given how often transient issues
arise. If I understand that bug correctly, there's a workaround that
you would be able to apply on the buildds - is that correct?

I filed #974004 to track this on the perl side.

Thanks
Dominic
Finn Thain
2020-11-08 22:40:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Post by Dominic Hargreaves
Right, it looks like the issue described at #931641 has returned.
This was apparently[1] fixed in qemu-user but I don't know any more
details about the fix (or indeed the deployment status of the buildds)
to check how it regressed.
It must be a slightly different issue and most likely this bug #970460 [1].
Avoiding the ext4 kernel module would avoid that bug, right?
Post by John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
A heads-up to us porters would have been nice prior the upload, now I'm
very much in a hurry to get perl_5.32 to be built not to fall back in the
transition *sigh*.
Adrian
Post by Dominic Hargreaves
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970460
Niko Tyni
2021-02-02 13:50:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Post by Dominic Hargreaves
Right, it looks like the issue described at #931641 has returned.
This was apparently[1] fixed in qemu-user but I don't know any more
details about the fix (or indeed the deployment status of the buildds)
to check how it regressed.
It must be a slightly different issue and most likely this bug #970460 [1].
A heads-up to us porters would have been nice prior the upload, now I'm
very much in a hurry to get perl_5.32 to be built not to fall back in the
transition *sigh*.
Hi, a late heads-up that Perl 5.32.1 failed to build on m68k and sh4,
probably because of this same issue.

It's just a mini-transition though (see #981232) so hopefully the hurry
is not quite as bad this time.
--
Niko Tyni ***@debian.org
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-02-02 14:10:02 UTC
Permalink
Hello!
Post by Niko Tyni
Hi, a late heads-up that Perl 5.32.1 failed to build on m68k and sh4,
probably because of this same issue.
It's just a mini-transition though (see #981232) so hopefully the hurry
is not quite as bad this time.
Thanks. I'm working on it now.

Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - ***@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - ***@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2022-02-05 11:00:03 UTC
Permalink
Hi!
Post by John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
A heads-up to us porters would have been nice prior the upload, now I'm
very much in a hurry to get perl_5.32 to be built not to fall back in the
transition *sigh*.
Hi, in case this is still an issue: Perl 5.34 transition is just about
to begin (see #1003176) so you might want to keep an eye on the builds.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=perl
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - ***@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - ***@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Niko Tyni
2022-02-05 11:10:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Post by Dominic Hargreaves
Right, it looks like the issue described at #931641 has returned.
This was apparently[1] fixed in qemu-user but I don't know any more
details about the fix (or indeed the deployment status of the buildds)
to check how it regressed.
It must be a slightly different issue and most likely this bug #970460 [1].
A heads-up to us porters would have been nice prior the upload, now I'm
very much in a hurry to get perl_5.32 to be built not to fall back in the
transition *sigh*.
Hi, in case this is still an issue: Perl 5.34 transition is just about
to begin (see #1003176) so you might want to keep an eye on the builds.
--
Niko Tyni ***@debian.org
Loading...